Calumny as a Measure of Validity

calumny [ˈkæləmnɪ]
 pl -nies

1. the malicious utterance of false charges or misrepresentation; slander; defamation
 such a false charge or misrepresentation
[from Latin calumnia deception, slander]

Like Talk Radio, one of the purposes of Opinion pieces is to stimulate discussion or more often to incite responses. The freedom to add or connect information which may not have sufficient evidence to warrant “hard” news coverage is a key value found in opinion columns.
When the author must sort to name calling,  distortion or incomplete facts to make a point, one must question whether there is any factual basis for the comment.  Since fact checking is a long process, a quick method of judging the validity of a comment and a commenter is the use of calumny, vitriol, epithets or slander.
A recent Washington Post editorial demonstrates this ( The editor recommends that all (presumably legal) means be used to punish both Julian Assange and anyone who attempts to help him.  To justify this position, however, the author uses calumny including the following:

small-time  autocrat
smell a political opportunity
chief Yanqui-baiter, friend-to-rogues
sycophantic interview
state propaganda outlet
wallow in anti-American slanders and paranoia
hacker, fantasy

Whether an author is “an entertainer”, ignorant of the facts or simply wants to persuade the audience to their way of thinking contrary to the facts, calumny quickly separates those who rely on fact versus truthiness.



  1. Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: